Questions and answers regarding the Konrad repository and the evaluation

In the first phase of the evaluation, four topic areas were addressed by six research institutes and engineering firms. The contractors were acquired within the framework of a public call for tenders, which imposed specific requirements in terms of the applicants’ technical expertise. The topic areas were: safety analysis of normal operation (Brenk Systemplanung GmbH), accident analysis (DMT GmbH & Co. KG, DSR Ingenieurgesellschaft mbH), safety analysis in relation to ensuring subcriticality in the operational phase (TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH) and safety analysis of the post-operational phase (Gesellschaft für Anlagen und Reaktorsicherheit GRS gGmbH, AF.Consult Switzerland Ltd., DMT GmbH & Co. KG). After drafts of the reports were submitted, the BGE commissioned a team of four scientists to carry out a peer review.

The peer review team, which was characterised by its technical expertise and independence, consisted of: Professor Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig (Institute of Disposal Research, TU Clausthal), Christian Küppers (Nuclear Engineering and Facility Safety, Öko-Institut e.V., Darmstadt), Professor Thorsten Schäfer (Institute of Geosciences/Applied Geology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena) and Professor Clemens Walther (Institute of Radioecology and Radiation Protection, Leibniz University Hannover). This preliminary state of affairs was presented to the specialist community in Braunschweig on 23 January 2019 before a further revision took place. The final reports from Phase 1 are now available.

Based on the final reports submitted by the contractors and the peer review team, the BGE is now preparing for Phase 2 of the evaluation. In Phase 2, the safety analyses will be examined in greater depth and updated if necessary. The BGE will take account of all safety-relevant areas in need of an evaluation that were identified in Phase 1 in addition to the information provided by the contractors and peer review team. Tasks identified in the process will be arranged into topics and dealt with systematically and with the necessary care with the help of external and internal experts. The preparation and carrying out of Phase 2 will take an extended period of time. The plan is also to discuss the results of Phase 2 with the specialist community at a workshop. In addition, the results will be subject to independent peer review, as in Phase 1.

This is the period of time after the radioactive waste has been placed underground in the Konrad repository, the emplacement chambers have been backfilled with special concrete, further cavities have been backfilled, and the two shafts of the repository have been securely sealed.

The aim of final disposal is to permanently enclose the radioactive waste in deep geological formations. In order to demonstrate that this objective will be achieved, geoscientific methods were used to predict the long-term development of the Konrad repository as part of the licensing procedure. Model calculations were performed in order to examine and assess the spread of radionuclides from the repository into the near-surface groundwater.

The results showed that the proof of safety required by the Atomic Energy Act has been provided successfully and that all dose values will be adhered to on a lasting basis. In the Konrad repository, long-term safety is ensured by the specific geological conditions and the secure sealing of both shafts.

All emplacement chambers, as well as the majority of the underground infrastructure spaces, are being newly excavated in previously unmined sections of the deposit – that is, the sections that were not used for raw-material extraction. No former mine excavations will be used for the final disposal of radioactive waste. Only the existing shafts and some underground infrastructure roads will continue to be used following conversion to repository operation.

In 2009, the Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit mbH (GRS) carried out the Konrad Transport Study on behalf of the federal government. In 2012, the consultancy firm intac GmbH carried out a technical assessment of the Konrad Transport Study on behalf of the City of Salzgitter. In turn, GRS issued a statement in relation to the assessment. As part of its reassessment (Konrad Transport Study, 2009), GRS showed that the waste transports coming together in the siting region of the Konrad repository do not represent a significant radiological risk to the population, the transport personnel or the environment.

This applies both to normal transport and to transport accidents. On 14 July 2015, the BfS brought together all participating actors within the framework of the “Konrad Transport Study” specialist workshop, which aimed to identify areas of technical consensus and disagreement, to determine competences for the individual topic areas, and to discuss the further procedure.

With regard to the question from the City of Braunschweig as to when an update of the Konrad Transport Study can be expected, the BMU made the following statement: “In order to be able to take account of the inventory of waste packages as realistically as possible and therefore, in particular, to be able to make specific estimates of the inventory in comparison with earlier studies, an updated Konrad Transport Study should be conducted as close as possible to the time of the repository’s commissioning.”